A Short Adverse Experiences Measure Among Mothers of Young Children.

OBJECTIVES: Screening for parental adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in pediatric settings can be burdensome because of the questionnaire's length and sensitive nature. Rapid screening tools may help address these challenges. We evaluated a 2-item short ACE measure developed for adults in a cross-sectional sample of mothers of young children in an urban pediatric emergency department. METHODS: From January 2011 to March 2020, we administered the ACE questionnaire in English or Spanish to 3999 biological mothers of children aged <4 years in a pediatric emergency department in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We assessed sensitivity and specificity of a shortened 2-item ACE measure defined as report of childhood emotional abuse and/or household substance use, using 4+ ACEs on the full questionnaire as the standard. We assessed convergent validity by comparing associations of the 2-item and standard measures with maternal, household, and child outcomes using adjusted log-binomial regression. RESULTS: Mothers were racially and ethnically diverse (54% Latina, 35% Black non-Latina); 94% of children were publicly insured. Thirteen percent of mothers reported childhood emotional abuse and 16% childhood household substance use; 23% reported at least 1 of these and 6% both. Compared with 4+ ACEs on the full questionnaire, the 2-item measure had sensitivity 88% and specificity 90%. In adjusted models, high adversity was associated with poor maternal, household, and child outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A 2-item ACE measure assessing childhood emotional abuse and household substance use may be useful in pediatric settings to identify mothers who may have experienced significant child adversity and inform development, testing, or provision of comprehensive family supports.

Understanding Caregiver Perspective on Social Determinants of Health Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care.

Comprehensive social risk screening has become standard practice in primary care. Evidence is lacking, however, on whether and how interventions provided for positive screens are being utilized. This study aimed to create a standardized follow-up process to evaluate caregiver perspective and usage of community resources provided during well-child visits. Follow-up calls were made to families with positive screens for food insecurity (FI) and/or utility insecurity (UI) (n = 347). Phone interviews assessed resource usage, effectiveness, influence on stress level, and current insecurity status. Caregiver responses regarding barriers to resource usage were inductively analyzed and developed into major themes. The sample included 228 (65.7%) families with positive screens for FI and 166 (47.8%) families screening positive for UI. Of those who completed interviews (n = 108), 77 (71.3%) caregivers recalled being provided resources during their child's visit with only 33 (42.9%) reporting use of those resources. Twelve (36.4%) of those caregivers who used the resources confirmed that their insecurity was still a concern. Five major themes for barriers to resource usage emerged: (1) improved situation, (2) perception, (3) access barriers, (4) conflicting priorities, and (5) too busy/overwhelmed. The majority of caregivers (95.7% of asked) noted that their insecurity caused increased stress with 70.5% acknowledging decreased stress levels after discussion with a provider. Integrating caregiver input through a standardized follow-up protocol into provided interventions for screened social risks can improve not only the quality and effectiveness of provided resources, but also provide insight into the impact of those interventions on insecurity from the caregiver perspective.

Stability of food insecurity status in paediatric primary care.

OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening for food insecurity (FI) at all well-child visits due to well-documented negative effects of experiencing FI in childhood. Before age 3, children have twelve recommended primary care visits at which screening could occur. Little is known regarding the stability of FI status at this frequency of screening. DESIGN: Data derived from electronic health records were used to retrospectively examine the stability of household FI status. Age-stratified (infant v. toddler) analyses accounted for age-based differences in visit frequency. Regression models with time since last screening as the predictor of FI transitions were estimated via generalised estimating equations adjusting for age and race/ethnicity. SETTING: A paediatric primary care practice in Philadelphia. PARTICIPANTS: 3451 distinct patients were identified whose health record documented two or more household FI screens between April 1, 2012 and July 31, 2018 and were aged 0-3 years at first screen. RESULTS: Overall, 9·5 % of patients had a transition in household FI status, with a similar frequency of transitioning from food insecure to secure (5·0 %) and from food secure to insecure (4·5 %). Families of toddlers whose last screen was more than a year ago were more likely to experience a transition to FI compared with those screened 0-6 months prior (OR 1·91 (95 % CI 1·05, 3·47)). CONCLUSIONS: Screening more than annually may not contribute substantially to the identification of transitions to FI.

Applying the Theory of Gendered Organizations to the Lived Experience of Women with Established Careers in Academic Medicine.

Phenomenon: The number of women who enter medical school has been on par with the number of men for almost 20 years, but parity in training has not translated to equity in professional life. To capitalize on the perspective of women faculty with established careers in academic medicine and to bring theory to the largely descriptive research on gender inequity in academic medicine, the authors used the Theory of Gendered Organizations to demonstrate how academic medical centers function as inherently gendered organizations. Approach: The authors recruited women faculty with established careers at one academic medical center based on purposeful and snowball sampling and interviewed 30 participants in Summer/Fall 2018. They coded and analyzed data inductively. In later stages of analysis they used sensitizing concepts from the Theory of Gendered Organizations to guide our focus on formal expectations of, and informal interactions in, the academic medical center. Findings: The disjuncture, i.e., "lip service", between formal expectations intended to be gender-neutral and informal interactions that advantaged men demonstrated how the academic medical center functioned as a gendered organization. Participants experienced these interactions as being treated differently than men and/or being stereotyped. As their careers progressed, participants recognized gender inequity as embedded in the organization, or as they said, "the way things were stacked". Subsequent to this recognition, they navigated this gendered organization by advocating for themselves and younger women faculty. Insights: Women with established careers in academic medicine experienced gender inequity as embedded in the organization but navigate gendered interactions by advocating for themselves and for younger women. Using the Theory of Gendered Organizations as an analytic lens demonstrates how academic medical centers function as gendered organizations; these findings can inform both theory-based research and pragmatic change strategies.